5 SEARCH ENGINE MYTHS DISPELLED

Paul Carpenter 24th May 2007
Paul Carpenter

If you've got even a casual interest in search engine promotion, you're probably more than aware that there's a lot of information out there about how to get that elusive number 1 spot on Google. Alas, most of the information out there is either outdated, or just plain wrong.

This brief guide takes you through five of the most common misconceptions about the search engines and how they work. Actually most of these techniques did work at one time, but the search engines are far, far smarter these days...

1: "Having a links exchange page is a great idea"

You don't have to know much about search engines to know that having links coming into your website is one of the cornerstones of any search engine strategy. Often, getting a link from someone requires a reciprocal link. This has led to the popularity of the dreaded "links" page - where all of these reciprocal links are hoarded together.

Unfortunately, such pages are pretty easy for Google to spot for what they are. If your site has dozens of links to petfood suppliers, viagra merchants, hat hiring companies and canoeing instructors but you yourself sell shoes, then Google just won't take you seriously.

If you must give a reciprocal link in order to gain one from a trusted source, make sure that the link is given in the footer of the page, or within a page of content - perhaps in a news story.

Links that appear within the natural flow of content appeal to Google's sense that links - like content - should be natural and not just there for SEO purposes.

2: "It's all in the metatags..."

Metatags are bits of code hidden away in your web page. They are visible to the search engines, but not to the person reading the page (unless you "view source"). The idea behind metatags was to give the early search engines an idea of what the page was about. By putting your keywords into the metatags, the search engines wouldn't have to try to decipher the content of the page itself.

Guess what happened?

Yup. Every man, his dog and his dog's wife stuck 'Britney Spears Knickers' in the meta tags and watched as the traffic poured in.

Guess what happened next?

Yup. Those clever search engines started ignoring the meta keywords tag. (whisper it: There's actually still something in them - but that's for another day.)

3. "Mention your keywords a lot..."

Contrary to popular belief, mentioning your keywords a lot can actually harm your page's ranking.

The search engines have invested huge sums of money, and countless hours of linguistic expertise in creating ways to determine whether a page is written in 'natural language' or not.

People still repeat keywords a lot - you've probably come across a page that reads something like this:

Dave's great canoes are the best canoes to buy canoes online uk with canoes in the uk. Canoes.

Pretty obviously, everyone did this at one point. Which made for pretty poor results - for both the search engines and visitor.

By studying the frequency of words, the length of your sentences and the structure of your document, Google can have a pretty good idea of whether your page is written for humans to read rather than a machine. If it thinks that your page has just been written for it's benefit, rather than for people, it will ignore it at best - and penalise you at worst.

4. "'Submitting your site to 10,000 search engines' is a sure-fire winner"

Actually, there are nothing like 10,000 search engines - certainly not ones that people actually use. Something like 85-95% of all searches are provided by Yahoo, Google and MSN. Even sites such as AOL, Ask and Altavista actually use the search results provided by the big three.

If a company tells you that they'll submit you to this many "search engines," then they will be basically taking your cash and adding you to loads of rubbish sites that no-one uses.

5. "Pagerank tells you how good your site is"

That funky little green bar you might have seen if you've installed the Google toolbar gives you a very approximate idea of Google's rating of the page you're on.

Essentially a mathematical equation, Pagerank takes into account various factors such as the number of links a page has, it's age and so on. It does not tell you where your site will rank. If you search for almost any keyword, you will find pages with a Pagerank of 8 sitting under a Pagerank 2.

Google's rankings are based on relevancy and trust - and Pagerank is only a very small part of that picture.

Today's Moral

If you've hired an SEO company, and they've suggested any of the above then you're pretty much wasting your money. At best, it will have no effect on your site's rankings. At worst, it will kill your site. So talk to your website marketing company. If they won't tell you what they're up to, then run. If they're happy to tell you, but they tell you any of the above, then think very carefully about letting them anywhere near your wallet.

Notes and Queries...

Hi, thanks for the helpful into.
Ken 23rd October 2007
question: years ago, I spoke with someone at yahoo who told me that any text within a table will not be considered (nor even seen) during a web search - so it has no bearing on web site rankings. Does this still hold true, or do current 'bots' see and consider text within a table?

thanks, ken@adventure1.com
ken 23rd October 2007
Hi Ken

Thanks for the feedback!

In answer to your question, the search engines are capable of seeing text in any format - and I'm surprised to hear that Yahoo! have ever suggested otherwise. Originally, HTML was designed for scientists to publish research, so tables are a natural - and crucial part - of the purpose of the web.

For various other reasons, using tables for laying out a page is sometimes considered to be not ideal but the method is so widespread that any search engine that ignored text in tables would have to ignore half the web.
Paul Carpenter 23rd October 2007
 
ADD YOUR COMMENT

Are you human? (sorry to ask!)
Please answer this question in the box below:

OTHER ARTICLES


THINK TANK
  • Web Design Yorkshire - Local Maps Fail
    "I think they must have been reading! That spurious result is history as of yesterday...."
    Paul Carpenter
    Why I Don't Rank For Zoe Piper
    "Hi! Zoe's page has always been titled for 'Zoe Piper' (check the Google index for the page) so I'm guessing it must have been a momentary database fail or something when you were looking Atom. I don't think the 'use your name many times in the body' advice is going to cut the mustard though. It used to work once upon a time, but if it were that easy (and I guess you're hinting at keyword density here) then it would be *easy* to rank for anything and we'd all be millionaires :) The thrust of Zoe's point is that www.zoepiper.com is a content free holding page, with no links and essentially of no value for anyone searching for 'Zoe Piper'. Google could show any other result from the first page of the SERPS at the top and it would be more relevant and useful..."
    Paul Carpenter
    How to Reindex Your Website Quickly in a Search Engine
    "same problem i am having with my new site updates at http://www.tmc.edu.sg sheesh .... "
    BBC
    Google and UK Spelling: 'Optimisation' vs 'Optimization'
    "Australia supports your crusade! pufft realizing indeed"
    Ian
    Why I Don't Rank For Zoe Piper
    "Hi Atom, I should really check my meta tags - thought they'd populate by default tbh! It's interesting with something like this to see how different factors are weighted, from URL to internal links to meta tags etc like you say. Unfortunately I can't go overboard on my profile page, it has to be short and sweet so on-page content is pretty much a no-no! Ah well...if people want me they'll find me. Thanks for the comment :)"
    Zoe
    Why I Don't Rank For Zoe Piper
    "Hi Zoe, There are some major reasons your not ranking. Your Meta tags say ""My Default Keywords". Also your name appears once in your profile page and the other time it does it is an image so that doesn't help. I bet if you added your full name to your profile some more times it would put you up in rankings. Also LinkedIn will has your name on one page over 50+ times so you need alot more usage to compete. But that is the way it goes. This is only a profile so I am sure you're limited. Despite having loads of content linked to your profile, Google also wants to see the relevance of Zoe Piper on this page and is only seeing it once. "
    Atom McCree
    Web Design Yorkshire - Local Maps Fail
    "I guess they do have quite a lot of services no-one uses...."
    Zoe
    Web Design Yorkshire - Local Maps Fail
    "Yet another useless, half arsed service from Google. "
    The Floating Frog
    “Cloaking” Content for SEO (Or What Happens When Your SEO Company Isn’t Telling What They’re Up To)
    "I thought these techniques died out with Windows 98', these people need to find a new career. Nice writeup BTW"
    The Floating Frog
    Web Design Yorkshire - Local Maps Fail
    "I've noticed this a lot recently - stupid map results like this that basically hand over a big slice of the search market to one company on the basis of what is (presumably) a bug. Fortunately, long term we're repositioning as a 'digital agency' in Leeds/Yorkshire because our portfolio offering is much wider so who cares ;-)"
    Carps

Get in touch

View our portfolio